Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartless Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heartless Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article that was previously deleted, yet it still fails notability criteria. Appears to have been created by a an editor with a WP:COI (I suspect that Ericlrule is the Eric Lipscomb mentioned in the article). Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There does not appear to be any significant independent coverage in reliable sources. WP:CORP is not met. Deli nk (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTPROMOTION LikeMeercats (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly speedy - Promotional, maybe even enough to incur G11. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 19:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.